The on-going care of patients with cancer: what is the appropriate balance of cancer care between specialists and primary care?

Smith, Fiona Jane Elizabeth (2015) The on-going care of patients with cancer: what is the appropriate balance of cancer care between specialists and primary care? PhD thesis, University of Glasgow.

This is the latest version of this eprint.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Mortality rates have fallen resulting in people living longer with cancer. However, cancer survivors can face significant treatment related physical and psychosocial issues including comorbidities. Treatment related side effects can persist in the long-term or may occur many years later. There is now a focus on the best way to provide appropriate care to people who have survived cancer and its treatment.

Aim: The aim of this study is to explore the appropriate balance of cancer care for patients following diagnosis and treatment between specialist and primary care.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 40 oncologists, CNSs and GPs across Scotland. Data are analysed in a systematic fashion using constant comparison.

Findings: Many patients face significant health care issues after a diagnosis of cancer. Professionals often play a pivotal role during follow-up by identifying and managing patients’ physical and psychosocial needs and by sign posting to address the challenges that arise. Psychosocial needs, long-term and late effects are sometimes not addressed. Oncologists are leaders of the cancer care process. CNSs often play a central role in survivorship both in specialist and primary care. GPs’ roles are seen to span the full spectrum of survivorship care, although this is largely opportunistic in nature. Communication between specialist and primary care is a key issue. Professionals perceived that there is insufficient contact across the interface in terms of understanding others’ viewpoints about the nature of their work. Efforts are needed to improve the timeliness and detail of letters to primary care. Successful primary care follow-up may require development of nurses’ roles in general practice and the community. It is perceived that GPs could attend specialist care for survivorship education or become cancer specialists in general practice. Cancer Care Reviews are considered useful tools in terms of allowing GPs to engage with their patients. Improvements to technology and further research are considered central to optimal cancer care.

Conclusion: Considerable barriers exist with the current system of follow-up. After the treatment phase, GP survivorship care is largely opportunistic and driven by patients’ needs. Based on the findings from this study, strategies of care could potentially be planned to facilitate the role of primary care. However, research supporting these practices is needed.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Qualification Level: Doctoral
Keywords: Survivorship, cancer care, health professionals
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Colleges/Schools: College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing
Supervisor's Name: O'Donnell, Professor Catherine and Macleod, Professor Una and Cassidy, Professor Jim
Date of Award: 2015
Depositing User: Unnamed user with username Fiona Smith
Unique ID: glathesis:2015-5970
Copyright: Copyright of this thesis is held by the author.
Date Deposited: 10 Feb 2015 11:43
Last Modified: 17 Aug 2015 10:01
URI: http://theses.gla.ac.uk/id/eprint/5970

Available Versions of this Item

  • The on-going care of patients with cancer: what is the appropriate balance of cancer care between specialists and primary care? (deposited 10 Feb 2015 11:43) [Currently Displayed]

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item