Sovereignty and contemporary Scottish constitutional debate

Hunter, Iain James (2018) Sovereignty and contemporary Scottish constitutional debate. LL.M(R) thesis, University of Glasgow.

Full text available as:
[thumbnail of 2018hunterLLM(R).pdf] PDF
Download (876kB)
Printed Thesis Information:


This thesis critically analyses the juristic concept of sovereignty in contemporary Scottish constitutional debate. ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty’ – the shibboleth of the British public lawyer – has by now weathered many attacks but remains stubbornly in place as the foundation of the United Kingdom’s constitution. The problems this has thrown up for the accommodation of Scotland in the famously vague yet remarkably resilient structures of the British constitution are well-documented, and they have provided useful ammunition for a resurgent political nationalism. A Scottish tradition of popular sovereignty has increasingly been invoked in recent decades as a counter to the dominance of Westminster’s absolute legislative authority. This ostensibly one-sided fight takes place in a field of inquiry most often avoided by British public lawyers: the interface between law and politics. The distinction between legal and political sovereignty is observed dogmatically in orthodox jurisprudence, and it has even coloured more radical attempts to re-imagine what sovereignty might mean in an era when many contend that sub-state and supra-state influences are reshaping the modern polity. It will be argued that a failure to properly theorise the juncture of law and politics in traditional Anglocentric scholarship has led to a situation in which the concept of sovereignty has become so misunderstood that its significance is routinely overlooked. Both extant pluralist treatments of sovereignty specifically addressed to the Scottish context and its recent invocations in contemporary constitutional debate have depended on erroneous or impoverished constructions of its meaning and function. It is submitted that the model of sovereignty developed by Martin Loughlin provides a superior analytical framework for investigations into the current constitutional position of Scotland, and offers a more illuminating account of the forces which are at work in a nascent Scottish public sphere.

Item Type: Thesis (LL.M(R))
Qualification Level: Masters
Keywords: Scotland, constitutionalism, legal theory, devolution, sovereignty.
Subjects: K Law > KD England and Wales > KDC Scotland
Colleges/Schools: College of Social Sciences > School of Law
Supervisor's Name: Goldoni, Dr. Marco
Date of Award: 2018
Depositing User: Mr Iain James Hunter
Unique ID: glathesis:2018-8957
Copyright: Copyright of this thesis is held by the author.
Date Deposited: 26 Apr 2018 09:06
Last Modified: 15 May 2018 08:41

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year