A comparative analysis of mediation by examination and critique of the theory and practice thereof in Germany, Scotland and Switzerland

Carle, Dominik Helmut (2015) A comparative analysis of mediation by examination and critique of the theory and practice thereof in Germany, Scotland and Switzerland. LL.M(R) thesis, University of Glasgow.

Full text available as:
[thumbnail of 2015carleLL.M(R).pdf] PDF
Download (587kB)
Printed Thesis Information: https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b3109772

Abstract

Mediation is a special form of alternative dispute resolution which is becoming more and more popular. This thesis is concerned with the development of the legal framework and the practical use of mediation in Germany, Scotland and Switzerland.
To harmonize the rules on mediation within the European Union, Directive 2008/52/EC was created imposing mandatory standards on certain aspects of mediation. The Directive is binding only in respect of cross-border dispute mediations (i.e. where at least one of the parties to the dispute is domiciled or habitually resident in a Member State other than that of any other party), but its provisions may also be applied to internal dispute mediation processes.

This led to the monistic approach on the one hand, where a legislation system simultaneously seeks to regulate both internal dispute and cross-border dispute mediations and thus treats them equally, and the dualistic approach, on the other hand, where cross-border dispute mediations are regulated separately, and thus internal dispute and cross-border dispute mediations may be treated differently.
In particular, this thesis is concerned with the question whether the distinction between internal dispute and cross-border dispute mediations drawn by Directive 2008/52/EC complicates the harmonization of the rules on mediation.

The implementation of Directive 2008/52/EC by the monistic approach in Germany, and by the dualistic approach in Scotland, and the autonomous handling of mediation legislation in Switzerland (which is not a Member State of the European Union and thus not bound by Directive 2008/52/EC) show different patterns of development with regard to mediation in Europe. The comparison among those different developments (regarding domestic dispute mediation and cross-border-dispute mediation) finally answers the question whether Directive 2008/52/EC in its current form was appropriate.

Item Type: Thesis (LL.M(R))
Qualification Level: Masters
Keywords: mediation, Directive 2008/52/EC, cross-border
Subjects: K Law > KZ Law of Nations
Colleges/Schools: College of Social Sciences > School of Law
Supervisor's Name: Carruthers, Professor Janeen
Date of Award: 2015
Depositing User: Dominik Helmut Carle
Unique ID: glathesis:2015-6408
Copyright: Copyright of this thesis is held by the author.
Date Deposited: 05 Jun 2015 09:17
Last Modified: 02 May 2018 12:35
URI: https://theses.gla.ac.uk/id/eprint/6408

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year